Over the weekend I learned that Fifty Shades of Grey made a movie and it's coming out in 2015.
For those of you who know me, I'm pretty quiet and easy-going. However, there are a few topics I get incredibly passionnate about. If any of these topics come up in conversation, my inner dragon comes out:
1. Child abuse
2. Objectification of Women
3. Sexual abuse due to #2
Well, I got curious and looked up the plot of Fifty Shades of Grey. It looks like it magnifies #2 and #3. And I'm a bit disgusted.
This series is anything but okay. I cannot stand any piece of media that portrays weak women being sexually exploited by powerful men. Furthermore, I cannot stand it when women read it and call it a good book or a good movie! The reason these tasteless books and movies are released is because they target a tasteless audience, which sadly constitutes a wide population of this increasingly tasteless planet.
Can you tell I get passionate about this?
Men are not sex fiends. And women are not sex objects. At least they shouldn't be. The fact that this series is all about a sex fiend who wants to control a women who gives her "consent" to be sexually abused is incredibly horrifying.
I wish I could fight it. But the best thing to do is not give it publicity. How can we make that happen?
If you want to read a really good article about this, look here: https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/to-the-christians-who-think-50-shades-is-all-sorts-of-awesome-please-stop-a
End of rant. :)
Monday, December 1, 2014
Letter to Carl's Jr
So, I know this is a long shot, especially after Dr. Coyne mentioned that she has written Carl's Jr. dozens of times and has heard no reply. This letter also may not be that persuasive. However, it's worth a try. I do like the idea of writing professional letters to clean up the media. Media, however, runs more like a business. It supplies the demand. The real way to clean up media is for consumers to want something more clean and family-friendly. The best way to fight against filthy media is for the majority of the population to ignore it. I don't know how to make that happen though.
Anyway, here is the letter I wrote to Carl's Jr this week.
To whom it may concern,
My name is Brianna Fox and I am currently a student at Brigham Young University. I am writing on behalf of the hundreds of females that have been injured and offended by Carl's Jr's unthoughtful advertising. I have been shocked by Carl's Jr's recent ads that portray sexualized women in an attempt to sexually arouse male consumers. This objectification of women is harmful, crass, dehumanizing, and offensive; it needs to stop.
There are dozens of studies that analyze the effects of sexual advertisements on consumer behaviors, though there are gaps in the literature. Still, several studies have found that sexualized advertisements do not leave lasting impressions on consumers. Brad J. Bushman, a PhD in the Department of Psychology, conducted a study in 2002 that found that sex advertisements reduced viewers' likelihood of remembering the advertised brand, their interest in buying that brand, and their likelihood of selecting a coupon for that brand, regardless of gender.
Similarly, Ellie Parker and Adrian Furnham of University College London conducted a study in 2007 that found that viewing sexual content in programs reduced the likelihood of recalling advertisements. This suggests that viewers are distracted by sex and put more interest into sex than in advertised products. The Carl's Jr. advertisements encourage consumers to think about sex; the ads may be doing very little to persuade consumers to purchase Carl's Jr. hamburgers. Women especially do not respond well to sexualized advertisements due to their preference for deep and meaningful relationships. Using sexualized advertisements effectively alienates the female population from potential consumers.
I am aware that some studies support the claim that sex sells to male consumers. However, the use of sexualized advertisements is unethical. It involves dehumanizing and objectifying the female population, which subsequently alienates a large percentage of potential consumers. This causes harm to both the company and its consumers. These offensive advertisements have also stirred men to action; they, too, are offended by the sexual ads. Hundreds of men and women have sworn off Carl's Jr. until the offensive ads are removed.
I strongly encourage Carl's Jr. to change its target audience from male adults to families. I came across an article on The Daily Signal which reports that Chick-Fil-A's family values have led to a higher customer satisfaction among kids than McDonalds: their strongest competitor. McDonalds made $55,856 million in net income in 2014. McDonalds is known for its strong appeal to kids; McDonalds targets a wider audience and consequently brings in more revenue. Feeding families will bring in more revenue than feeding single men. By shaming and alienating women, Carl's Jr is chasing away both mothers and children. These populations constitute a vast majority of fast-food consumers.
I politely request the removal of your offensive advertisements from television. These ads glorify the objectification of women, which teaches children the wrong message about how women should be viewed and treated. This may lead to the further dehumanization of women. Women should not be portrayed as mindless sex objects, nor should men be portrayed as mindless sex fiends. Please keep your restaurants family-friendly. It will be beneficial to both your business and your consumers. Thank you for your time.
Best,
Anyway, here is the letter I wrote to Carl's Jr this week.
To whom it may concern,
My name is Brianna Fox and I am currently a student at Brigham Young University. I am writing on behalf of the hundreds of females that have been injured and offended by Carl's Jr's unthoughtful advertising. I have been shocked by Carl's Jr's recent ads that portray sexualized women in an attempt to sexually arouse male consumers. This objectification of women is harmful, crass, dehumanizing, and offensive; it needs to stop.
There are dozens of studies that analyze the effects of sexual advertisements on consumer behaviors, though there are gaps in the literature. Still, several studies have found that sexualized advertisements do not leave lasting impressions on consumers. Brad J. Bushman, a PhD in the Department of Psychology, conducted a study in 2002 that found that sex advertisements reduced viewers' likelihood of remembering the advertised brand, their interest in buying that brand, and their likelihood of selecting a coupon for that brand, regardless of gender.
Similarly, Ellie Parker and Adrian Furnham of University College London conducted a study in 2007 that found that viewing sexual content in programs reduced the likelihood of recalling advertisements. This suggests that viewers are distracted by sex and put more interest into sex than in advertised products. The Carl's Jr. advertisements encourage consumers to think about sex; the ads may be doing very little to persuade consumers to purchase Carl's Jr. hamburgers. Women especially do not respond well to sexualized advertisements due to their preference for deep and meaningful relationships. Using sexualized advertisements effectively alienates the female population from potential consumers.
I am aware that some studies support the claim that sex sells to male consumers. However, the use of sexualized advertisements is unethical. It involves dehumanizing and objectifying the female population, which subsequently alienates a large percentage of potential consumers. This causes harm to both the company and its consumers. These offensive advertisements have also stirred men to action; they, too, are offended by the sexual ads. Hundreds of men and women have sworn off Carl's Jr. until the offensive ads are removed.
I strongly encourage Carl's Jr. to change its target audience from male adults to families. I came across an article on The Daily Signal which reports that Chick-Fil-A's family values have led to a higher customer satisfaction among kids than McDonalds: their strongest competitor. McDonalds made $55,856 million in net income in 2014. McDonalds is known for its strong appeal to kids; McDonalds targets a wider audience and consequently brings in more revenue. Feeding families will bring in more revenue than feeding single men. By shaming and alienating women, Carl's Jr is chasing away both mothers and children. These populations constitute a vast majority of fast-food consumers.
I politely request the removal of your offensive advertisements from television. These ads glorify the objectification of women, which teaches children the wrong message about how women should be viewed and treated. This may lead to the further dehumanization of women. Women should not be portrayed as mindless sex objects, nor should men be portrayed as mindless sex fiends. Please keep your restaurants family-friendly. It will be beneficial to both your business and your consumers. Thank you for your time.
Best,
Brianna Fox
Friday, November 21, 2014
Political Polarization
I always
had the suspicion that Facebook wasn't the best place to discuss politics.
Though it seems like it would be a good way for people to stay politically
connected, I wasn't surprised when I stumbled upon this study that people of
certain parties tend to be surrounded by their own party's material in their
own social media.
I think
this could lead to a serious problem. A lot of political topics are discussed
over Facebook. A lot of controversial topics are discussed over Facebook as
well. From what I've seen, Facebook discussions don't really help anyone.
People just get fired up and verbally tear others apart because they forget
they're addressing a real person. No matter what you say to these people, they
are hard to sway. They seem to walk away with a greater conviction than before,
whether right or wrong. I think this fire is fed by their feeds; the majority
of the posts and tweets they see are in agreement with their own political
views. This could lead to serious political polarization.
I wonder
how social media will continue to change the way that campaigns are run. It
would be interesting to see studies that analyze the impact that social media
has on voters. For those who want to learn about both parties from a non-biased
source, I would stay away from social media. And the internet.
Food for thought!
Thursday, November 20, 2014
E-Books: Friend or Foe?
I remember my first
response to E-readers. I think it matched the typical reaction that the average
person generally has to new media. When I was in 11th grade my mom got a Kindle
for Christmas. I wrote an entire paper about why I thought this wasn't a good
idea. No, I did not show it to my mom. It was for class.
But even then I had
a hard time writing that paper. I poured out my love for books onto those pages
as I wrote. I described the feeling of euphoria that accompanies picking up a
new book and smelling its fresh pages while fanning them out in front of my face
for the first time. I described how I loved the simple act of turning each page
to let the story unfold before my eyes. I loved books.
I still love books!
But I actually don't mind E-readers anymore. At first I thought they were a
terrible idea. I saw them as a threat to my beautiful books. I saw them as
mediums that could not convey the same message as a book, even if they
contained the same words. I thought that the world would become a world of
solely e-books and that I would have to build an underground shrine to my Harry
Potter collection.
That actually sounds
kind of fun. But I no longer think it's necessary.
I still agree that
the message feels different depending on the medium. I have yet to read one of
my favorite books online, but I have switched to online Gospel study. I have
noticed that as I have read the Book of Mormon through the Gospel Library App that
I feel the exact same Spirit that I feel when I read a hard copy. I learn just
as much. I love how I can quickly mark and make notes into the text, go back
and add things, delete old notes, and revise my writings. That would be kind of
a fun trick for an e-book.
So, if I feel the
same Spirit while reading the Book of Mormon online, I wonder if that would
hold for my other favorite books. I will always love the smell and feel of hard
copies. But it might be kind of fun to put my entire library online and carry
it around with me on one device.
Monday, November 17, 2014
How Kids Want to Change Their Bodies
I love kids. We as adults have a lot to learn from their childlike innocence. My fiancé showed me this article that I absolutely love. The video portrays both children and adults responding to the same question: what would they change about their bodies? The adults responded almost automatically and focused on what they did not like about their bodies. The children, on the other hand, would give themselves fantastical superpowers. This serves as a reminder that beauty certainly isn't everything. We should be grateful for the bodies that we have been given. And, if we find ourselves daydreaming about changing our bodies, we should focus more on our desire to sprout wings and fly. That's what I've wanted since I was a child!! 😊
Enjoy!
http://time.com/3558383/video-adults-kids-change-bodies-question/
Enjoy!
http://time.com/3558383/video-adults-kids-change-bodies-question/
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
Disney Princesses with Real Waistlines
I came across this article the other day that I thought was really interesting. Artists went back and drew in realistic proportions for several Disney princesses, and they all look great! I think the realistic human body is much more beautiful than the body portrayed with no waist at all. Seeing the pictures side by side is fascinating too. You don't realize how unrealistic their waistlines are until you compare them with what a normal waistline looks like.
I think drawing Disney characters with a realistic waistline would also help the characters be more relatable to young viewers. It may also help with self-image by giving little girls an accurate idea of what an average body looks like.
Read it! It's fascinating. :)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/30/disney-princess-real-waistline_n_6076634.html
I think drawing Disney characters with a realistic waistline would also help the characters be more relatable to young viewers. It may also help with self-image by giving little girls an accurate idea of what an average body looks like.
Read it! It's fascinating. :)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/30/disney-princess-real-waistline_n_6076634.html
Sunday, November 9, 2014
Interstellar!!!!
This post may not even be coherent because it is super late and all I want to be right now is unconscious. BUT. I have to post about Interstellar.
That movie is so good. It is one of my favorite movies directed by Chris Nolan thus far, though I still say Inception remains my favorite. However, there are so many things about Interstellar that I absolutely loved.
First, I saw it on Imax. So it was even more beautiful because I got to watch it on a giant screen. The filming was fantastic. Each scene was beautiful, and I was so impressed with the special effects. Secondly, the music was phenomenal. The music itself conveyed themes portrayed in the movie. When you watch it, pay attention to the music. The two-tone music reflects a binary theme. Pretty appropriate, no? Genius.
Thirdly, the themes of the movie were beautiful. I love how it weaves in love of family between a father and a daughter, the power of love in general, the importance of overcoming fear, of choosing love over survival, and more. I love the dynamic of each individual character. Almost every character in the film was incredibly well-written, and they all act upon different motives, which diversity reflects the different characteristics of the human race.
That movie is so good. It is one of my favorite movies directed by Chris Nolan thus far, though I still say Inception remains my favorite. However, there are so many things about Interstellar that I absolutely loved.
First, I saw it on Imax. So it was even more beautiful because I got to watch it on a giant screen. The filming was fantastic. Each scene was beautiful, and I was so impressed with the special effects. Secondly, the music was phenomenal. The music itself conveyed themes portrayed in the movie. When you watch it, pay attention to the music. The two-tone music reflects a binary theme. Pretty appropriate, no? Genius.
Thirdly, the themes of the movie were beautiful. I love how it weaves in love of family between a father and a daughter, the power of love in general, the importance of overcoming fear, of choosing love over survival, and more. I love the dynamic of each individual character. Almost every character in the film was incredibly well-written, and they all act upon different motives, which diversity reflects the different characteristics of the human race.
Technology in the Hands of Two Year Olds
I'm already amazed how technology has managed to fall into the grasp of toddlers. Take my nephew for example. He is the cutest child under the sun. He's about age 2, and he loves technology more than any toddler I have ever seen. If you have a cell phone, an i-pad, a laptop, or any technology of any sort, he is right at your side. I'm not sure what enthralls him so much. Probably the light, the sounds, and the colors. My nephew loves touch screens in particular. He loves to scroll through screens with his finger, and most of all, he loves to take pictures.
In fact, he loves to take pictures so much that he actually made up his own sign language that signals to us that he wants to use a camera on someone's iphone or ipad. His parents taught him several signs, and sometimes he makes up his own. When he wants to take pictures, he will stick out his right hand and stick out his pointer finger and point down several times, reflecting the motion of pushing a button. It's the cutest thing ever. And terribly difficult to say no to. Which is why it was hard for me to pay attention during a few general conference talks a few weeks ago.
What's the point of this post? I'm not sure. Just the fact that it's amazing how toddlers will now entertain themselves on ipads, iphones, and other media that others would suggest are not for kids. It makes me wonder how technology will continue to influence young children in the future.
In fact, he loves to take pictures so much that he actually made up his own sign language that signals to us that he wants to use a camera on someone's iphone or ipad. His parents taught him several signs, and sometimes he makes up his own. When he wants to take pictures, he will stick out his right hand and stick out his pointer finger and point down several times, reflecting the motion of pushing a button. It's the cutest thing ever. And terribly difficult to say no to. Which is why it was hard for me to pay attention during a few general conference talks a few weeks ago.
What's the point of this post? I'm not sure. Just the fact that it's amazing how toddlers will now entertain themselves on ipads, iphones, and other media that others would suggest are not for kids. It makes me wonder how technology will continue to influence young children in the future.
Sunday, November 2, 2014
Facebook: Fact or Fiction?
Facebook is fascinating. We use it to connect with other people and to share how we are doing, yet it still gives us a warped view of reality. Now I can't speak for everyone, but I would assume that many people post their ideal lives on Facebook. They announce all the exciting news and the joyful moments to celebrate, but once hard times hit they quiet down. We seldom can understand what others are going through scrolling through their Facebook wall.
I will even admit to this. Last Friday I got engaged to my fiancé, and naturally Facebook was the medium I chose to let most people know. We posted pictures, I wrote a blog post, and my notifications exploded. We received a lot of incredibly validating feedback. Which was awesome. Well, since he proposed his car has broken down twice and I have been facing some of my most stressful academic days of my life. Did I post all that on Facebook?
Of course not! Why ruin the joy of the moment by posting a complaint? I want everyone to see that I am still happy. Because I certainly am! I've never been happier. Doesn't mean I'm not incredibly stressed or that my life is perfect, though. Which is what we tend to see when we scroll others' Facebook pages. We see what is on the surface, but we rarely see the difficult challenges that are going on back stage. Some people are incredibly open with their challenges on Facebook. I, however, tend to keep those to myself.
So this post is just a little reminder to never compare your life with the life you see someone else living on Facebook. Because you are only seeing a piece of reality.
Why Youtube is the Best Idea Ever
Youtube is the best idea ever. I have a very practical personality. I just love how practical youtube is. You can use it to find out how to do just about anything.
You're a female and need to tie a tie for a Halloween costume? Look it up on YouTube.
Need to learn how to play your favorite song on the piano? Look it up on YouTube.
Need to learn how to cook your favorite recipe? Look it up on YouTube.
Car broke down and you need to replace your fuel pump but don't know exactly how? Look it up on YouTube.
Yes, that last one actually happened. Two days ago, to be exact. It was not me who looked it up though. I Do not know the first thing about cars. My fiancé's car broke down and his friend pulled up how to change a fuel pump on YouTube.
Why some random guys posted a video on YouTube about changing a fuel pump I will never know. But it inthe ultimate how to. You can learn how to do practically anything. Which is a comfort to me if my car ever breaks down and I have to take action, or if I find myself in another precarious situation.
YouTube. Best idea ever.
You're a female and need to tie a tie for a Halloween costume? Look it up on YouTube.
Need to learn how to play your favorite song on the piano? Look it up on YouTube.
Need to learn how to cook your favorite recipe? Look it up on YouTube.
Car broke down and you need to replace your fuel pump but don't know exactly how? Look it up on YouTube.
Yes, that last one actually happened. Two days ago, to be exact. It was not me who looked it up though. I Do not know the first thing about cars. My fiancé's car broke down and his friend pulled up how to change a fuel pump on YouTube.
Why some random guys posted a video on YouTube about changing a fuel pump I will never know. But it inthe ultimate how to. You can learn how to do practically anything. Which is a comfort to me if my car ever breaks down and I have to take action, or if I find myself in another precarious situation.
YouTube. Best idea ever.
Thursday, October 23, 2014
Why I'm not using Pinterest to plan my wedding
Now this post is going to be a little nicer than my one bashing mainstream media. I know there are a lot of Pinterest fans out there. This is just my own personal opinion.
Pinterest has been around for years, and maybe it's just because I prefer to be one step behind in mainstream media, but I never touched it until recently. I didn't quite understand the Pinterest hype. But I wasn't one to judge, because I had never created an account or used the website for anything.
Well, I'm trying to plan a wedding. I am anything but the creative type. So! I get myself a Pinterest account. I bailed within 10 minutes.
Why? I don't know. Maybe it's because I'm trying to plan a wedding during the most crazy semester of my life. Whatever it is, Pinterest is way too overstimulating for me. I jump on hoping that it will give me some ideas, but what I get is an explosion of endless pins with possibilities. Some personalities like that; it feeds their creativity. I, on the other hand, am very practical, and possibilities just increase the overall stress. I can't navigate the site very well, but for very orderly and practical personalities like the one I have, I personally think Pinterest should have a way of narrowing the search. The categories are way too broad for me. I was looking for bridesmaids dresses and I already had some idea of what I wanted them to look like. I hopped on Pinterest and all I saw were hundreds of pins with dresses that didn't come anywhere close to what I was looking for. I didn't find it very helpful.
I don't know! Is there a way to narrow the search? That would make my life infinitely better.
I guess I'm not a huge fan of the idea of Pinterest either. Maybe it's because I'm too practical. I see all these ideas posted on individual pins, but am left with no set plans to put these ideas into action. When I browse Pinterest it feels like most of the pins I see are cute ideas but I have no idea where to even begin to use that idea for my own wedding. Granted, there are a few that have direct links to websites where you can find certain products, but generally, I feel that it is just filling my brain with more possibilities without giving me any real substance.
But maybe one has to be taught to use Pinterest to plan a wedding. Especially one such as myself who generally stays away from popular media.
Pinterest has been around for years, and maybe it's just because I prefer to be one step behind in mainstream media, but I never touched it until recently. I didn't quite understand the Pinterest hype. But I wasn't one to judge, because I had never created an account or used the website for anything.
Well, I'm trying to plan a wedding. I am anything but the creative type. So! I get myself a Pinterest account. I bailed within 10 minutes.
Why? I don't know. Maybe it's because I'm trying to plan a wedding during the most crazy semester of my life. Whatever it is, Pinterest is way too overstimulating for me. I jump on hoping that it will give me some ideas, but what I get is an explosion of endless pins with possibilities. Some personalities like that; it feeds their creativity. I, on the other hand, am very practical, and possibilities just increase the overall stress. I can't navigate the site very well, but for very orderly and practical personalities like the one I have, I personally think Pinterest should have a way of narrowing the search. The categories are way too broad for me. I was looking for bridesmaids dresses and I already had some idea of what I wanted them to look like. I hopped on Pinterest and all I saw were hundreds of pins with dresses that didn't come anywhere close to what I was looking for. I didn't find it very helpful.
I don't know! Is there a way to narrow the search? That would make my life infinitely better.
I guess I'm not a huge fan of the idea of Pinterest either. Maybe it's because I'm too practical. I see all these ideas posted on individual pins, but am left with no set plans to put these ideas into action. When I browse Pinterest it feels like most of the pins I see are cute ideas but I have no idea where to even begin to use that idea for my own wedding. Granted, there are a few that have direct links to websites where you can find certain products, but generally, I feel that it is just filling my brain with more possibilities without giving me any real substance.
But maybe one has to be taught to use Pinterest to plan a wedding. Especially one such as myself who generally stays away from popular media.
Sunday, October 19, 2014
Cinderella! Everywhere!!
Two days ago my boyfriend and I watched Ever After together. I love Ever After. It is definitely my favorite of the plethora of Cinderella stories found in the media. Each character (with the exception of the baronness and Marguerite) have their own kind of growth and transformation. The dialogue is absolutely brilliant, the love story is actually believable, and the story has a fun and entertaining plot to follow.
We happened to watch Ever After together the day after we watched Cinderella's episode of Once Upon a Time, which throws in the twist that Cinderella finds her story's happy ending (kinda) after making a deal with the baby-hungry Rumpelstiltskin.
I started to think about all the other Cinderella stories in the media. A quite obvious one is "A Cinderella Story," which puts a modern twist on the Cinderella story, starring Hillary Duff. Others include "Slipper in the Rose," "Ella Enchanted," Disney's "Cinderella," "Another Cinderella Story," Roger and Hammerstein's "Cinderella," and "If the Shoe Fits." In fact, there are dozens! Cinderella stories are everywhere! I wonder if Cinderella isn't the most popular fairytale; its plotline seems to weave its way into dozens of stories. The prevalence of Cinderella-themed plotlines would be an interesting content analysis.
So why is Cinderella so popular?
This is something that has actually intrigued me for years. What is it about the story of Cinderella that creates enough appeal to retell the story in hundreds of books and movies? I have a few ideas. The challenges presented can appeal to many. Some struggle with broken families. Some struggle with feelings of rejection, betrayal, ostracism, and loneliness. Some feel out of place, some feel overworked, some feel that their circumstances are preventing them from reaching their potential or finding happiness. Cinderella struggles with all of these difficulties and finds a quick and simple solution: a fairy Godmother who makes all her dreams come true with the flick of a wand. Suddenly Cinderella rises from rags to riches, finds love, and lives happily ever after.What's not appealing about that?
Not that I'm accusing the human race of not having the desire to solve their own problems. But I'm sure everyone would agree that it would be nice to have an external influence solve all our problems for us.
But does real growth occur when that happens?
Plus, some of these Cinderella stories do not even include a fairy godmother. In some of them, the heroine has to endure trials and challenges throughout the entire story until she finally achieves her grand reward.
Perhaps it's the hope that anyone's rotten circumstances can change that appeals to audiences everywhere. Whatever it is, I still find myself among Cinderella fans. As long as the story isn't cliche. Which is kind of hard to pull off when it has been done so many times.
We happened to watch Ever After together the day after we watched Cinderella's episode of Once Upon a Time, which throws in the twist that Cinderella finds her story's happy ending (kinda) after making a deal with the baby-hungry Rumpelstiltskin.
I started to think about all the other Cinderella stories in the media. A quite obvious one is "A Cinderella Story," which puts a modern twist on the Cinderella story, starring Hillary Duff. Others include "Slipper in the Rose," "Ella Enchanted," Disney's "Cinderella," "Another Cinderella Story," Roger and Hammerstein's "Cinderella," and "If the Shoe Fits." In fact, there are dozens! Cinderella stories are everywhere! I wonder if Cinderella isn't the most popular fairytale; its plotline seems to weave its way into dozens of stories. The prevalence of Cinderella-themed plotlines would be an interesting content analysis.
So why is Cinderella so popular?
This is something that has actually intrigued me for years. What is it about the story of Cinderella that creates enough appeal to retell the story in hundreds of books and movies? I have a few ideas. The challenges presented can appeal to many. Some struggle with broken families. Some struggle with feelings of rejection, betrayal, ostracism, and loneliness. Some feel out of place, some feel overworked, some feel that their circumstances are preventing them from reaching their potential or finding happiness. Cinderella struggles with all of these difficulties and finds a quick and simple solution: a fairy Godmother who makes all her dreams come true with the flick of a wand. Suddenly Cinderella rises from rags to riches, finds love, and lives happily ever after.What's not appealing about that?
Not that I'm accusing the human race of not having the desire to solve their own problems. But I'm sure everyone would agree that it would be nice to have an external influence solve all our problems for us.
But does real growth occur when that happens?
Plus, some of these Cinderella stories do not even include a fairy godmother. In some of them, the heroine has to endure trials and challenges throughout the entire story until she finally achieves her grand reward.
Perhaps it's the hope that anyone's rotten circumstances can change that appeals to audiences everywhere. Whatever it is, I still find myself among Cinderella fans. As long as the story isn't cliche. Which is kind of hard to pull off when it has been done so many times.
Best Youtube Video Ever
I came across this Youtube video the other day that made my life.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z2Z23SAFVA
And now I quote it all the time. So does my boyfriend. And all of his coworkers.
There are so many reasons why this video is awesome. Firstly, it appeals to grammar and spelling Nazis like myself. It pokes fun at egregious spelling errors in a non-aggressive way, in my opinion.
The animation of the words is also visually captivating. Even though all this video portrays is words on a screen, it animates them in such a way that makes it entertaining. I may or may not have watched this video at least a dozen times.
And finally, the choice of soundtrack adds the perfect overdramatic tone to the entire review. It adds to the overall humor and appeal of the video, thus making it a masterpiece.
Go watch it.
"Beacuase the voices where pretty good . . ."
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z2Z23SAFVA
And now I quote it all the time. So does my boyfriend. And all of his coworkers.
There are so many reasons why this video is awesome. Firstly, it appeals to grammar and spelling Nazis like myself. It pokes fun at egregious spelling errors in a non-aggressive way, in my opinion.
The animation of the words is also visually captivating. Even though all this video portrays is words on a screen, it animates them in such a way that makes it entertaining. I may or may not have watched this video at least a dozen times.
And finally, the choice of soundtrack adds the perfect overdramatic tone to the entire review. It adds to the overall humor and appeal of the video, thus making it a masterpiece.
Go watch it.
"Beacuase the voices where pretty good . . ."
Sunday, October 12, 2014
Meet the Mormons
Last night I saw Meet the Mormons and was pleasantly surprised. I can honestly say that it is not what I anticipated. I thought that the movie would be a documentary that focused more on Mormon Doctrine and how our beliefs set us apart from other denominations. Instead, I was surprised to see that the documentary places an emphasis on how Mormons live their lives. The overarching theme that I believe the Brethren were aiming for is that Mormons are normal, everyday people. I love how the video portrayed ordinary people doing extraordinary things that bring them so much joy and fulfillment.
The idea behind this movie truly is brilliant. I was pleasantly surprised to hear that after seeing the movie, viewers were more likely to walk away with a more accurate representation of who Mormons are and what we believe. They are more likely to think of us as Christian. I was also pleasantly surprised to find that it ranked number ten in the box office. It is another significant effort put forth by the church to help the world understand who we truly are. Though it does not include much doctrine, it does a fantastic job of showing examples of how true disciples of Christ live their lives. It gives people an accurate idea of our values. I was incredibly touched by each of the stories featured in the film. Though it's primary purpose is not to proselyte, I believe that it will plant many seeds in people's hearts.
It's awesome! Go see it!
It's awesome! Go see it!
Monday, October 6, 2014
Why I Love General Conference
Yes! Another post about Conference. Can you blame me? Conference is awesome!! I look forward to it like Christmas! Lemme tell ya why.
In my opinion, Conference is everything the media needs to be. I love having the opportunity to watch inspiring messages back to back. I never watch 8 hours of television over the weekend except for General Conference time. It's TV viewing that is actually fulfilling and leaves you with a desire to do and to be a better person. That's what the best kind of media does for you. It inspires you to change and inspires you to act. I can't think of any media that does that better than General Conference.
This Conference weekend was particularly fun. The last time General Conference rolled around I was still on my mission in Tennessee and had no access to social media. I watched every talk with other people in mind; I wanted to know what I could share with investigators to help bring them closer to Christ. This time I had no investigators, but I had a few of them as friends on Facebook, along with several others that I had taught on my mission. I thought I could use that to my advantage this time.
I had Facebook open almost the entire time and went to town. I updated my status with new inspiring messages every ten to fifteen minutes. My friends were doing the same thing. At the same time, memes with inspiring messages were springing up all over my feed, people were discussing spirituality, and everyone was "liking" each other's statuses. My Facebook feed has never been more inspirational.
It was so cool! Sometimes around Conference time I would hop on Facebook and I would see several statuses in my feed bashing the Church, its leaders, and my beliefs. I used to avoid Facebook during Conference time for that particular reason. I love how I can now use it as a tool for good. I believe this is what the Brethren had in mind when they asked us to use social media to share our messages with the world. Imagine if everyone's Facebook feed looked like mine did over the weekend. The world would be a much less hateful place. Social media can be a powerful tool! Let's use it for good!
In my opinion, Conference is everything the media needs to be. I love having the opportunity to watch inspiring messages back to back. I never watch 8 hours of television over the weekend except for General Conference time. It's TV viewing that is actually fulfilling and leaves you with a desire to do and to be a better person. That's what the best kind of media does for you. It inspires you to change and inspires you to act. I can't think of any media that does that better than General Conference.
This Conference weekend was particularly fun. The last time General Conference rolled around I was still on my mission in Tennessee and had no access to social media. I watched every talk with other people in mind; I wanted to know what I could share with investigators to help bring them closer to Christ. This time I had no investigators, but I had a few of them as friends on Facebook, along with several others that I had taught on my mission. I thought I could use that to my advantage this time.
I had Facebook open almost the entire time and went to town. I updated my status with new inspiring messages every ten to fifteen minutes. My friends were doing the same thing. At the same time, memes with inspiring messages were springing up all over my feed, people were discussing spirituality, and everyone was "liking" each other's statuses. My Facebook feed has never been more inspirational.
It was so cool! Sometimes around Conference time I would hop on Facebook and I would see several statuses in my feed bashing the Church, its leaders, and my beliefs. I used to avoid Facebook during Conference time for that particular reason. I love how I can now use it as a tool for good. I believe this is what the Brethren had in mind when they asked us to use social media to share our messages with the world. Imagine if everyone's Facebook feed looked like mine did over the weekend. The world would be a much less hateful place. Social media can be a powerful tool! Let's use it for good!
Saturday, October 4, 2014
Why I Hate Most Mainstream Media
Okay, so "hate" is a strong word. But I'm using it anyway.
Some may be wondering why I'm writing a post on my media blog about why I can't stand most mainstream media. I don't enjoy offending people. I would rather not offend people. But I'm very opinionated and my blog is a great place to express my opinion. So if you are really attached to Twilight, The Hunger Games, Lost, action movies, or popular television shows (excluding Sherlock and Doctor Who because I actually love those shows) you should probably read a different post.
I guess what sparked this idea was a very brief conversastion I had with my roommate while I was grading papers last night. She was trying out a new television show and she told me to listen in so I could give her my opinion after the show was over. My first reaction, though I did not verbalize it, was, "Oh honey the last opinion you want is mine." Why?
Because I'm INCREDIBLY PICKY!
Here is my criteria for a good piece of media:
1. PLOT! I have found that popular movies and television shows either lack a plot line or the plot is garbage juice.
2. Characters. They have to have depth. They have to be relatable. They have to be likeable. Their motives have to be realistic. And the main characters have to undergo some kind of transformation. I like characters that make me want to pick them apart and analyze them. If you want to watch or read something with good characters, turn to Harry Potter or Sherlock. That's what I'm talking about.
3. As a critical part of the plot, it has to have a good ending. A story with a good beginning does not make a good story unless it also has a well-written ending. I don't like it when authors get lazy on me. Think of the ending from the beginning don't write it as you go along. #Lost.
4. If it is written as a first person narrative, the main character has to not be. Annoying.
5. Female characters need to be strong. Don't throw a female character into a story just for the sake of putting a romance in the story. Give her some depth, please?
I have more. But that would take too long.
Twilight. I do not like Twilight. The plot is underdeveloped. The characters do not have solid motives. There are plot holes everywhere. The characters are flat. No depth at all. It appeals to the emotion of a physical relationship. The story is not that good. I do not like it, Sam I Am.
Hunger Games. The author is trying to make a point, but doesn't know how. Is it desentization to media violence? She should have centered it around the viewers then. Is it the fear of corrupt government? She should have focused more on the governing powers. All I got out of that book was that teenagers probably should not kill each other. The main character does not have enough depth to have the book written in first person narrative. The romance is not realistic. The names are weird. I know. I'm not very nice.
Action movies never have a plot. Because the producers are way too focused on action. So they throw in a mediocre story and hope the action will make up for it. Not okay. Lazy.
Lost. Now I am just bitter. Because the show was absolutely brilliant. The characters all had depth, the plot was unfolding beautifully, and the writing was incredible. And then the writers got stuck. And didn't know how to end it. So they did not tie up any of the loose ends and left me feeling anything but satisfied. 80 hours of my life. Gone.
And I basicslly dislike all mainstream television shows for the same reasons mentioned above. Few writers know how to piece together a good plot, write good characters, and insert hidden meanings to give the story more depth.
Hats off to J.K. Rowling. Because she knows how to do all of that stuff. Long live Harry Potter.
Some may be wondering why I'm writing a post on my media blog about why I can't stand most mainstream media. I don't enjoy offending people. I would rather not offend people. But I'm very opinionated and my blog is a great place to express my opinion. So if you are really attached to Twilight, The Hunger Games, Lost, action movies, or popular television shows (excluding Sherlock and Doctor Who because I actually love those shows) you should probably read a different post.
I guess what sparked this idea was a very brief conversastion I had with my roommate while I was grading papers last night. She was trying out a new television show and she told me to listen in so I could give her my opinion after the show was over. My first reaction, though I did not verbalize it, was, "Oh honey the last opinion you want is mine." Why?
Because I'm INCREDIBLY PICKY!
Here is my criteria for a good piece of media:
1. PLOT! I have found that popular movies and television shows either lack a plot line or the plot is garbage juice.
2. Characters. They have to have depth. They have to be relatable. They have to be likeable. Their motives have to be realistic. And the main characters have to undergo some kind of transformation. I like characters that make me want to pick them apart and analyze them. If you want to watch or read something with good characters, turn to Harry Potter or Sherlock. That's what I'm talking about.
3. As a critical part of the plot, it has to have a good ending. A story with a good beginning does not make a good story unless it also has a well-written ending. I don't like it when authors get lazy on me. Think of the ending from the beginning don't write it as you go along. #Lost.
4. If it is written as a first person narrative, the main character has to not be. Annoying.
5. Female characters need to be strong. Don't throw a female character into a story just for the sake of putting a romance in the story. Give her some depth, please?
I have more. But that would take too long.
Twilight. I do not like Twilight. The plot is underdeveloped. The characters do not have solid motives. There are plot holes everywhere. The characters are flat. No depth at all. It appeals to the emotion of a physical relationship. The story is not that good. I do not like it, Sam I Am.
Hunger Games. The author is trying to make a point, but doesn't know how. Is it desentization to media violence? She should have centered it around the viewers then. Is it the fear of corrupt government? She should have focused more on the governing powers. All I got out of that book was that teenagers probably should not kill each other. The main character does not have enough depth to have the book written in first person narrative. The romance is not realistic. The names are weird. I know. I'm not very nice.
Action movies never have a plot. Because the producers are way too focused on action. So they throw in a mediocre story and hope the action will make up for it. Not okay. Lazy.
Lost. Now I am just bitter. Because the show was absolutely brilliant. The characters all had depth, the plot was unfolding beautifully, and the writing was incredible. And then the writers got stuck. And didn't know how to end it. So they did not tie up any of the loose ends and left me feeling anything but satisfied. 80 hours of my life. Gone.
And I basicslly dislike all mainstream television shows for the same reasons mentioned above. Few writers know how to piece together a good plot, write good characters, and insert hidden meanings to give the story more depth.
Hats off to J.K. Rowling. Because she knows how to do all of that stuff. Long live Harry Potter.
Saturday, September 27, 2014
How is Pornograpy Addictive?
We hear all the time that pornography is addictive, but we rarely hear about the effects it has on your brain. I found an interesting infographic on how pornography affects the chemical processes in your brain. I knew that pornography was addictive, but I failed to realize that the brain responds to pornography the same way the brain responds to drugs. No wonder it is a difficult habit to shake; it tricks the brain into thinking that it needs pornography to function.
It is also sad to see all the negative effects of pornography on a person's relationships, sense of identity, personal beliefs, and success in the school and workplace. I believe that pornography is the most dangerous media in terms of the psychological damage that it can inflict upon its viewers. It is so sad how accesible it is in today's society. With just a click of a button, anyone could encounter it. This article in particular strengthens my resolve to always keep filters on all my devices and keep computers in a public place in my future home. People need to be aware of its destructive tactics.
Take a look at the article! It's pretty interesting.
http://cdn.iwastesomuchtime.com/August-28-2014-02-30-27-KillsLoveCopy.jpg
Friday, September 26, 2014
Fantasy Violence - What are the Consequences?
I am a TA for Human Development and have just spent the last three days grading dozens of papers that critically analyze an argument that asserts that media violence leads to desensitization to violence, aggression, and acts of violence in young children. It was interesting to think about this argument in the context of the material we have been learning in our media class. The particular article in question is outdated and I am unaware of more current studies on the topic. It is hard to create a valid and reliable study about the effects of media violence that controls for confounding variables and that can be generalized to the population in question. The more I think about it, the less sure I am about the consequences of violent media on subsequent aggression.
One genre I am particularly curious about is fantasy violence. Fantasy violence seems to be a more popular genre portrayed in movies and in video games. Does media that portrays fantasy violence lead to desentization and acts of aggression in individuals?
I have been spending the last few weekends watching the extended versions of each of the Lord of the Rings films (which happen to be my all-time favorite movies on the planet). I grew up on that series and I practically have the films memorized. It is interesting to note that I am incredibly sensitive to violent media. I can hardly handle watching any kind of violent or intense scenes in films that portray more realistic situations. However, the Lord of the Rings films do not bother me at all, and those movies are incredibly violent. I grew up on those films, yet I have not been desensitized to violence at all, nor do I have an aggressive bone in my body. It makes me wonder if fantasy violence does not effect individuals as much as realistic violence, or if violent media in general effects people at all. But I'm just one case out of millions.
Thoughts?
One genre I am particularly curious about is fantasy violence. Fantasy violence seems to be a more popular genre portrayed in movies and in video games. Does media that portrays fantasy violence lead to desentization and acts of aggression in individuals?
I have been spending the last few weekends watching the extended versions of each of the Lord of the Rings films (which happen to be my all-time favorite movies on the planet). I grew up on that series and I practically have the films memorized. It is interesting to note that I am incredibly sensitive to violent media. I can hardly handle watching any kind of violent or intense scenes in films that portray more realistic situations. However, the Lord of the Rings films do not bother me at all, and those movies are incredibly violent. I grew up on those films, yet I have not been desensitized to violence at all, nor do I have an aggressive bone in my body. It makes me wonder if fantasy violence does not effect individuals as much as realistic violence, or if violent media in general effects people at all. But I'm just one case out of millions.
Thoughts?
Thursday, September 18, 2014
Steve Jobs Withheld I-Products from his Kids?!
I came across an article today that blew my mind. Steve Jobs, famously known for the innovation of apple products, did not let his kids use i-phones or i-pads. He saw the potential dangers behind misusing technology and didn't want to see that happen to his kids. Instead, he placed a huge emphasis on family togetherness and interaction. He made a point to have a family dinner every night, where he and his family would discuss books, history, and other topics.
I also found it interesting that this article cites a study from the University of California that found an immediate increase in social skills among children within days of abstaining from media.
I think that is really neat. Steve Jobs revolutionized technology but did not let it take over his life, or the lives of his family members. He understood the importance of social interaction and did not let technology be a substitute. I think everyone can learn from his example.
Read the article!! It's incredibly short and wonderfully fascinating.
http://www.inquisitr.com/1468612/steve-jobs-didnt-let-his-kids-use-iphones-or-ipads-heres-why/#BvfH32gYFlASIVlh.01
I also found it interesting that this article cites a study from the University of California that found an immediate increase in social skills among children within days of abstaining from media.
I think that is really neat. Steve Jobs revolutionized technology but did not let it take over his life, or the lives of his family members. He understood the importance of social interaction and did not let technology be a substitute. I think everyone can learn from his example.
Read the article!! It's incredibly short and wonderfully fascinating.
http://www.inquisitr.com/1468612/steve-jobs-didnt-let-his-kids-use-iphones-or-ipads-heres-why/#BvfH32gYFlASIVlh.01
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Notifications!!!!!
I got bored in my two-hour-long class today. This comes as no surprise. However, what did come as a surprise was how I naturally responded. I was taking notes on my i-pad and decided to quickly pull up Facebook to check for notifications. Nothing. So I pull up my email and check for new messages. Nothing. So I pull up Facebook to check for notifications. I toggled between my Facebook and email three or four times before I realized what I was doing.
Yeup. I'm addicted to notifications.
I'm not even interested in Facebook feeds. I check my Facebook dozens of times every day just to see if I have a new notification. If I don't see a notification, I don't spend any more time on Facebook. Sometimes I'll try to think of an extra-clever status so that the next time I check Facebook I will have a new notification.
It's not just notifications on Facebook. I check my phone all the time, even if I haven't felt a vibration. I check my email all the time. When I feel bored, I automatically turn to social media. I am still trying to figure out why. I think it comes from an inner desire to feel connected with people. Though having someone like my status doesn't help me become best friends with that person, it still facilitates some kind of connection. Checking all the time for notifications, emails, and texts goes beyond just looking for something to do. It comes from a desire to connect.
I think the same principle applies to others. The other day, out of pure curiosity, I decided to count the number of cell phones I saw on the way to class, whether people were talking on them, texting, or simply holding their phones in their hand. During my ten minute walk to class I counted 105 cell phones. A lot of those cell phones were not being used, they were simply out. Why do people cling to their phones? Because they love feeling connected. We tend to get hooked on media that allows us to communicate and connect with others. We just need to make sure that these types of social media do not take over our lives to the extent that they actually inhibit our ability to connect with others.
On that note, comment on my blog so I can get a new email. :)
Yeup. I'm addicted to notifications.
I'm not even interested in Facebook feeds. I check my Facebook dozens of times every day just to see if I have a new notification. If I don't see a notification, I don't spend any more time on Facebook. Sometimes I'll try to think of an extra-clever status so that the next time I check Facebook I will have a new notification.
It's not just notifications on Facebook. I check my phone all the time, even if I haven't felt a vibration. I check my email all the time. When I feel bored, I automatically turn to social media. I am still trying to figure out why. I think it comes from an inner desire to feel connected with people. Though having someone like my status doesn't help me become best friends with that person, it still facilitates some kind of connection. Checking all the time for notifications, emails, and texts goes beyond just looking for something to do. It comes from a desire to connect.
I think the same principle applies to others. The other day, out of pure curiosity, I decided to count the number of cell phones I saw on the way to class, whether people were talking on them, texting, or simply holding their phones in their hand. During my ten minute walk to class I counted 105 cell phones. A lot of those cell phones were not being used, they were simply out. Why do people cling to their phones? Because they love feeling connected. We tend to get hooked on media that allows us to communicate and connect with others. We just need to make sure that these types of social media do not take over our lives to the extent that they actually inhibit our ability to connect with others.
On that note, comment on my blog so I can get a new email. :)
Friday, September 12, 2014
"Sherlocked"
Upon returning home from my mission, I was one of those "awkward missionaries" that couldn't handle exposure to media. I could only handle watching cartoons with light-hearted and heart-warming stories attached to them, like "The Lego Movie" and "My Little Pony" (don't judge me).
But, for some reason or another, I found myself jumping right back into watching BBC's Sherlock. I have been home for six weeks and it still remains the only non-cartoon TV that I watch. A lot has changed in 18 months, but I find that I am still hooked on this show.
Why is that? That is something I've been trying to figure out. In class we discussed how people watch different types of media to fill certain needs. Why am I so attached to this show? I suppose I can conclude that it fills some of my needs. I'm hoping I don't have a need for violence (though it really doesn't incorporate much violence so I can safely rule that one out). I don't have a need for suspense (because I can't handle any greater amount of uncertainty in my life), or mystery (I'm not a huge fan of that genre) or high-functioning sociopaths shooting snarky comments at me all day.
Or maybe I do.
I've concluded that it's the characters. I. Love. Sherlock and Watson. Their friendship dynamic is incredibly endearing. Though a snarky, practically heartless, high-functioning sociopath, Sherlock has a soft spot for his best and only friend. I love the way they communicate and how their friendship is portrayed. The script, in my opinion, is incredibly brilliant. The actors bring their characters alive. I am so emotionally attached to these characters that I find myself captivated by their stories. That is why I think this show is so incredibly brilliant. It is not just the story line or the complexity of the mysteries presented. It is the brilliant portrayal of the characters that captivates people such as myself.
I'm sure many people, like me, are not afraid to admit that they are "Sherlocked."
But, for some reason or another, I found myself jumping right back into watching BBC's Sherlock. I have been home for six weeks and it still remains the only non-cartoon TV that I watch. A lot has changed in 18 months, but I find that I am still hooked on this show.
Why is that? That is something I've been trying to figure out. In class we discussed how people watch different types of media to fill certain needs. Why am I so attached to this show? I suppose I can conclude that it fills some of my needs. I'm hoping I don't have a need for violence (though it really doesn't incorporate much violence so I can safely rule that one out). I don't have a need for suspense (because I can't handle any greater amount of uncertainty in my life), or mystery (I'm not a huge fan of that genre) or high-functioning sociopaths shooting snarky comments at me all day.
Or maybe I do.
I've concluded that it's the characters. I. Love. Sherlock and Watson. Their friendship dynamic is incredibly endearing. Though a snarky, practically heartless, high-functioning sociopath, Sherlock has a soft spot for his best and only friend. I love the way they communicate and how their friendship is portrayed. The script, in my opinion, is incredibly brilliant. The actors bring their characters alive. I am so emotionally attached to these characters that I find myself captivated by their stories. That is why I think this show is so incredibly brilliant. It is not just the story line or the complexity of the mysteries presented. It is the brilliant portrayal of the characters that captivates people such as myself.
I'm sure many people, like me, are not afraid to admit that they are "Sherlocked."
Wednesday, September 10, 2014
What *Does* the Fox Say?
Youtube sensations. "Gangham Style." "Friday." I have always found them intriguing. I am especially intrigued by the success of "What does the Fox say?" which now has hit more than 447,000,000 views.
This video first became popular while I was serving a mission for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Missionaries do not spend any time or energy surfing Youtube, so I was incredibly confused when someone read my name tag and, upon learning that my name was Sister Fox, asked me, "What does the Fox say?" My response? "Umm.....I teach the gospel! Is that what you're asking me?"
Although I had never seen the video, I still saw the effects of this Youtube sensation everywhere. About 3-4 times *daily* I would hear the question, "What does the Fox say?" Sometimes people even sang it to me. By the end of my mission I was so incredibly curious about this mysterious Youtube sensation that it was the first piece of media I watched upon returning home.
My reaction: *THIS* is popular?
Perhaps I had spent too long detached from the media to fully appreciate the humor and music presented in "What does the Fox say?" However, I wasn't too surprised to learn that the video was originally intended to fail and it's popularity was a complete accident. So why did it become popular? How did it speak to millions of people? Why did I get dozens of "likes" on my Facebook status that announced the title of my new blog? Why did my dad, who works for the Church, think it would be funny to hook the video up to giant speakers in his workplace and blast it across the entire floor?
No idea.
I have my guesses, though. The song, though perfectly ridiculous, is incredibly repetitive and catchy. It's clean. It's fun and crazy. It gets stuck in your head. The video is weird. Perhaps it helps people escape for a few minutes from a rigid world of stress and high-demand and allows them to embrace their inner spontaneity and extraordinariness that makes life more exciting. What *does* this Fox say? I still don't know why it's popular. What do you say? I guess you'll just have to watch the video.
Although I had never seen the video, I still saw the effects of this Youtube sensation everywhere. About 3-4 times *daily* I would hear the question, "What does the Fox say?" Sometimes people even sang it to me. By the end of my mission I was so incredibly curious about this mysterious Youtube sensation that it was the first piece of media I watched upon returning home.
My reaction: *THIS* is popular?
Perhaps I had spent too long detached from the media to fully appreciate the humor and music presented in "What does the Fox say?" However, I wasn't too surprised to learn that the video was originally intended to fail and it's popularity was a complete accident. So why did it become popular? How did it speak to millions of people? Why did I get dozens of "likes" on my Facebook status that announced the title of my new blog? Why did my dad, who works for the Church, think it would be funny to hook the video up to giant speakers in his workplace and blast it across the entire floor?
No idea.
I have my guesses, though. The song, though perfectly ridiculous, is incredibly repetitive and catchy. It's clean. It's fun and crazy. It gets stuck in your head. The video is weird. Perhaps it helps people escape for a few minutes from a rigid world of stress and high-demand and allows them to embrace their inner spontaneity and extraordinariness that makes life more exciting. What *does* this Fox say? I still don't know why it's popular. What do you say? I guess you'll just have to watch the video.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)